Written by Glory Emanuelle (24/541077/PSA/20745)
In contemporary media studies, fanfiction has emerged as a vital site for examining the intersections of desire, identity, and power within popular culture. Among the most enduringly popular fan-created pairings is Superbat, the romantic and often erotic coupling of Superman/Clark Kent and Batman/Bruce Wayne. This pairing not only queers the heteronormative frameworks of mainstream superhero narratives but also navigates the complex class dynamics embedded within their characters. In this essay, I propose that Superbat fanfiction serves as a postmodern cultural practice, wherein queer fans, through Henry Jenkins’s concept of textual poaching, subvert hegemonic narratives including heteronormativity and capitalism. By queering both the bodies and classed identities of its protagonists, Superbat fanfiction destabilizes what Jean-François Lyotard identifies as grand narratives, offering alternative, emotionally intimate masculinities and reimagined class dynamics through postmodern techniques of parody, pastiche, and gender performativity.
Fanfiction offers a unique space where readers and writers resist these limitations. Jenkins’ concept of textual poaching articulates how fans appropriate and reinterpret existing media texts for their own cultural and political purposes (Jenkins, 1992). The term “fanfiction” was first introduced in 1939 to refer to amateur narratives that appropriated characters, settings, or themes from existing media texts. However, it was not until the advent of digital culture and the widespread accessibility of the internet that fanfiction evolved into a significant and highly visible cultural phenomenon, enabling fan communities to produce, share, and circulate their own transformative works on a global scale (Reich, 2015; Sharma, 2021). Preslar (2021) asserts that “male slash fanfiction provides the chance to examine the disruption of the heteronormative through the queering of male characters and placing them into situations that may embrace the feminine or a female-gendered experience,” and she continued that the “situating of heterosexual male characters into queered roles allows an examination of how this disrupts canonical ideas of gender, identity, and sexuality,” (p. 2).
Superbat fanfiction writers actively poach these characters from their original contexts to restructure their relationship through queer desire and emotional intimacy, often dismantling the rigid class hierarchies embedded in their canonical roles. In these fanfictions, Bruce’s wealth is portrayed as both a source of conflict and an aspect of his complicated relationship with Clark, whose working-class background offers emotional resilience and moral authority. Through this, fans question the capitalist emphasis on wealth and dominance found in mainstream narratives.
This fannish intervention operates within what Lyotard describes as the postmodern condition, characterized by skepticism toward grand narratives — those legitimizing myths such as capitalism, heterosexual romance, and the “American Dream” (Lyotard, 1984). Superbat fanfiction dismantles these totalizing frameworks by queering masculine identities and destabilizing class power structures. In doing so, it offers what Linda Hutcheon calls a parodic postmodern practice: one that simultaneously critiques and celebrates the narratives it rewrites through intertextuality and pastiche (Hutcheon, 1988). Fanfiction’s playful subversions, genre mixing, and trope inversions are not merely entertainment but acts of cultural resistance against dominant ideologies. This postmodern strategy of resistance is particularly evident in the way Superbat fanfiction negotiates identity and class dynamics within its narratives. Moving beyond the critique of grand narratives alone, these fanworks engage with the performative nature of identity itself, revealing how relational hierarchies of power — especially those structured by wealth and social status — can be dismantled and reimagined through fannish intervention.
Superbat fanfiction offers a particularly rich site for examining the intersection of identity performativity and class dynamics within postmodern fan practices. In both mainstream m/m and heterosexual narratives, wealth frequently operates as a proxy for social and sexual dominance, positioning the affluent character as emotionally detached and in control. However, in the context of Superbat, Bruce Wayne’s immense wealth and capitalist authority are fundamentally destabilized by Clark Kent’s superhuman strength, working-class identity, and moral ethos. Drawing on Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity from her book Gender Trouble (1990), which frames identity as constituted through repeated, socially mediated acts, fanfiction subverts the expected performances attached to wealth and power. Bruce’s economic dominance is often undermined by Clark’s emotional labor, resilience, and literal physical superiority, reframing relational power away from capital and toward affective and bodily capacities. This inversion disrupts the conventional alignment between wealth and control, offering a postmodern critique of capitalist relational structures. By unsettling these hierarchies, Superbat fanfiction highlights the constructed, unstable nature of identity and class power within both narrative and social frameworks.
Speaking about narrative, mainstream superhero narratives often serve as modern mythologies, perpetuating dominant ideologies around nationalism, masculinity, and capitalist individualism. Bruce Wayne and Clark Kent are particularly iconic in their embodiment of these values: Bruce as a hyper-capitalist vigilante, emotionally stunted and reliant on wealth and technology, and Clark as a working-class immigrant figure representing American moral exceptionalism. These characters, however, are also saturated with homosocial tensions. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s influential work on male homosocial desire highlights how Western literature and media construct intense emotional and affective bonds between men that are often suffused with sublimated erotic potential, yet compulsively disavowed to preserve heterosexual norms (Sedgwick, 1985). In superhero media, these dynamics are omnipresent but unresolved, creating a fertile ground for fanfiction writers to intervene and rewrite canon.
Perhaps, I would like to point out that even within canonical superhero narratives, the pervasive presence of emotionally charged male homosocial bonds subtly destabilizes the heterosexual grand narrative that structures the genre. Sedgwick (1985) argues that while male homosocial desire is not synonymous with homosexuality, the cultural proximity between the two produces significant anxieties within texts that must be actively managed. Superhero media’s reliance on intense, emotionally dependent male partnerships — whether through camaraderie, rivalry, or mutual sacrifice — creates a hidden instability in the heteronormative framework. These homosocial dynamics suggest alternative modes of masculine intimacy that resist easy categorization within heterosexuality. Even when canon narratives disavow queer potential through love interests or heteronormative resolutions, the subtext remains operative, producing what Sedgwick describes as structural incoherence in heteronormative storytelling. Superbat fanfiction, by making this subtext explicit, exposes and amplifies the queer possibilities already embedded within the genre’s homosocial structures.
Beyond its narrative subversions, Superbat fanfiction also holds significant implications for queer identity formation and community-building in digital spaces. The internet’s role in the popularization of fanfiction has allowed for the emergence of what scholars describe as participatory fan cultures—networks where fans not only consume but actively produce, share, and reinterpret cultural texts (Jenkins, 1992; Bury, 2018). For queer individuals, whose desires and identities have often been marginalized or erased in mainstream media, these spaces operate as a form of what Eve Sedgwick might call a reparative reading practice, which are spaces where fans can reassemble existing stories into more affirming and politically resistant forms.
Fanfiction platforms like Archive of Our Own (AO3) and Tumblr serve as both creative outlets and communal safe havens where queer fans can experiment with identity, sexuality, and relational models without the constraints of heteronormative expectations (Byron et al., 2019; Llewellyn, 2021; Haimson et al., 2019). The practice of sharing fanfiction and engaging in comment threads, reblogs, and fandom-specific discourses constructs an affective network in which marginalized voices find visibility and validation (Smith, 2017). Here, the act of writing and reading slash fiction such as Superbat is not simply personal entertainment but an act of cultural negotiation and resistance, enabling queer fans to articulate desires and power dynamics that challenge mainstream scripts.
Moreover, these digital fandoms often emphasize community over competition, fostering environments of mutual support and collaboration. The norms of transformative fandom encourage practices like beta-reading, fanart exchanges, and fic recommendations, creating participatory cultures built on sharing, care, and recognition. This communal ethic stands in sharp contrast to the isolating, individualist logic of capitalist cultural production. In this sense, fanfiction functions not only as a site of narrative subversion but also as a form of cultural labor that produces alternative, queer-centered public spheres. As such, Superbat fanfiction and similar fan practices destabilize heteronormativity not only through their content but through their very modes of circulation and exchange. By reimagining both narrative structures and social relations, these fan cultures offer queer individuals the means to inhabit and reshape cultural narratives that have historically excluded or pathologized them. In doing so, fanfiction communities enact a minoritarian cultural politics—one rooted in pleasure, solidarity, and the persistent refusal of normative scripts.
All in all, Superbat fanfiction exemplifies how postmodern fan practices resist hegemonic cultural narratives by reworking characters into queer, emotionally rich, and class-conscious figures. By integrating Jenkins’ textual poaching, Lyotard’s critique of grand narratives, Hutcheon’s theorization of parody and pastiche, Butler’s deconstruction of gender performativity, and Sedgwick’s insights on male homosocial desire, I contend that fanfiction represents not merely derivative storytelling, but an essential postmodern cultural labor. It offers alternative queer desires that challenge the normative structures of mainstream media, contributing to an ongoing reimagining of gender, sexuality, and power within popular culture.
Also, I’d like to add that the cultural significance of Superbat fanfiction extends beyond narrative subversion to the communities that produce and sustain it. These fan spaces, mostly digital and participatory, act as emotional and political safe spaces where queer individuals can imagine new ways of connecting and relating to one another, free from the pressures of mainstream media’s heteronormative and capitalist expectations. In these settings, practices of sharing, feedback, and collaborative creation resist the isolating individualism of consumer culture, fostering instead economies of care, recognition, and collective authorship. By remaking not only characters but also social relations, these fan practices expose the inherent instability of identity categories and cultural hierarchies long presented as fixed. Superbat fanfiction, then, is not just a playful reinterpretation but a quiet form of cultural resistance—one that creates space for marginalized voices and politics through pleasure, desire, and community. I find it very delightful how fandom can imagine and build alternatives to dominant culture from within and against it.
References
Bury, R. (2018). “We’re not there” Fans, Fan Studies, and the Participatory Continuum. In M. A. Click & S. Scott (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom. Taylor & Francis Group.
Butler, J. (2006). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
Byron, P., Robards, B., Hanckle, B., Vivienne, S., & Churchill, B. (2019). “Hey, I’m Having These Experiences”: Tumblr Use and Young People’s Queer (Dis)connections. International Journal of Communication, 13(2019), 2239–2259. https://researchnow-admin.flinders.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/15489152/9677_38368_3_PB.pdf
Haas, L., & Tussey, J. (2023). Empowering Minds: Multimodal Literacies, Fanfiction, and Inclusive Education. Journal of English Teaching through Movies and Media, 24(4), 28-40. https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2023.24.4.28
Haimson, O. L., Dame-Griff, A., Capello, E., & Richter, Z. (2019). Tumblr was a trans technology: the meaning, importance, history, and future of trans technologies. Feminist Media Studies, 21(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1678505
Hutcheon, L. (1988). A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. Routledge.
Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture. Routledge.
Llewellyn, A. (2021, June). “A Space Where Queer Is Normalized”: The Online World and Fanfictions as Heterotopias for WLW. Journal of Homosexuality, 69(1), 1-22. 10.1080/00918369.2021.1940012
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition : a report on knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.
Preslar, S. L. (2021). Fanfiction: A Look into the Disruptions of Gender Identity through Tropes. East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations. https://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5401&context=etd
Reich, J. (2015, July 25). Fanspeak: The Brief Origins Of Fanfiction. Tech Times. Retrieved June 10, 2025, from https://www.techtimes.com/articles/70108/20150723/fan-fiction-star-trek-harry-potter-history-of-fan-fiction-shakespeare-roman-mythology-greek-mythology-sherlock-holmes.htm
Sedgwick, E. K. (1985). Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. Columbia University Press.
Sharma, M. (2021, March 9). Fanfiction leaves its mark on pop culture – The Purple Tide. The Purple Tide. Retrieved June 10, 2025, from https://chantillynews.org/6608/arts-and-entertainment/fanfiction-leaves-its-mark-on-pop-culture/
Smith, J. (2017). In Defense of Fanfiction. The Morningside Review, 13. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/TMR/article/view/5410
